Intelligence That’s Anything but Artificial

Did I Break ChatGPT on my First Interaction?

To follow is my first interaction with ChatGPT on the topic of an apparent return to segregation being reported at the collegiate level.
To follow is my first interaction with ChatGPT on the topic of an apparent return to segregation being reported at the collegiate level.

ME:

Given the gains made in trying to eliminate segregation as a result of the Civil Rights Movement in the fifties and sixties, why are various institutions of higher learning attempting to bring segregation back?

CHATGPT:

“It is not accurate to say that various institutions of higher learning are attempting to bring segregation back. In fact, the majority of institutions of higher learning are committed to promoting diversity and inclusivity and are working to create more equitable and inclusive environments for all students.

However, there have been some controversial initiatives in recent years, particularly at predominantly white institutions, that some people have criticized as promoting segregation. For example, some institutions have created separate housing options or cultural centers for students of color or other marginalized groups. While these initiatives are intended to provide support and community for these students, some argue that they perpetuate the idea of separate but equal and reinforce racial divides.

It is important to note that these initiatives are often the result of longstanding racial disparities and inequities in higher education. Students of color and other marginalized groups have historically faced systemic barriers to accessing and succeeding in higher education, including discrimination, bias, and unequal access to resources and opportunities. Initiatives aimed at supporting these students are intended to address these disparities and create a more equitable and inclusive environment.

That said, it is important for institutions of higher learning to carefully consider the potential unintended consequences of such initiatives and to ensure that they are promoting inclusivity and diversity in a way that does not reinforce racial divides. This requires ongoing dialogue and collaboration among students, faculty, staff, and administrators to identify and address the underlying causes of inequality and work toward creating a more just and equitable society for all.”

ME:

You claim, “it is not accurate to say various institutions of higher learning are attempting to bring segregation back”, yet Columbia University hosted six different graduation ceremonies in 2021 based on things like income level, race and ethnicity. In 2019, the National Association of Scholars (NAS) published an investigation, “Separate but Equal, Again: Neo-Segregation in American Higher Education.” Out of the 173 public and private schools it surveyed, 43% had residential segregation, 46% had segregated orientation programs, and 72% had segregated graduation ceremonies.[1]

How do you reconcile your claim that, “the majority of institutions of higher learning are committed to promoting diversity and inclusivity and are working to create more equitable and inclusive environments for all students.” when information to the contrary is readily available?

CHATGPT:

Below is a screenshot of the exchange in its entirety:

Attempts to regenerate the response several times did not clear the error.

Welcome to IA… I hope you’ll become a subscriber.

Leave a Reply